The Sinhalese Buddhist majority in  

Sri Lanka call for a Halal Boycott

Following the Government Minister raising his voice against the Halal Certification racket in SriLanka on 14th February,  the Sinhalese Buddhist majority in Sri Lanka has called for the abolition of the Muslim halal system of certifying foods & other goods and said NO to any new Mosques. There is now a Halal Crisis in Sri Lanka with a call to take action and to SAY NO TO HALAAL.

 ‘හලාල්’ වෙනුවෙන් උලමා-උලමා ගැටේ

‘හලාල්’ වෙනුවෙන් උලමා-උලමා ගැටේ

Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is a naturally beautiful island off the Southern tip of India.
Until May 2009, when the government forces seized the last area controlled by Tamil Tiger rebels,  the people had experienced a long and bitter civil war for more than 25 years which arose out of ethnic tensions between the majority  Sinhalese and the Tamil minority in the northeast.  The violence killed more than 70,000 people, damaged the economy and harmed tourism in one of South Asia’s potentially most prosperous societies.

The Buddhist majority in the country are peace-loving and fair-minded, but it is vital not to hurt their feelings or insult other faiths.

They abhor the halal ritual slaughter which Muslims insist is necessary to produce halal meat. This outdated 7th Century Ritual Slaughter seems unnecessarily cruel to livestock in 21st Century Sri Lanka, but muslims insist that the Muslim way of slaughter is the best and they say that the animals get no feeling when the jugular vein of the neck is cut and the blood flows from the body… Muslims believe that immediately after the cut , the whole body of the animal will get numb and it will not feel any pain. Muslims are against stunning the animal, because they say that the blood will still be there and the animal will suffer.  However a  four year Dialrel Study carried  out by Veterinary Scientists from many countries of Europe found the opposite is true and they concluded that halal ritual slaughter causes unnecessary suffering.

The publication of that Scientific Paper is here and is entitled ‘Veterinary Concerns’

Sri Lanka say NO to Halal Meat and its Halal Animal Bi-Products
Sri Lanka say NO to Halal Meat and its Halal Animal Bi-Products

Buddhist monk Kirama Wimala Jothi has urged Sri Lanka’s non-Muslim majority to boycott any product with the halal label and asked the government to outlaw Islamic clerics issuing such certification.

A Facebook Group called  SAY NO TO HALAL in SRI LANKA has now been set up  with a growing following here…


Sri Lanka Say NO to HAlaal Reject All Halaal Products!  Halaal is a trojan horse of sharia law!
Sri Lanka Say NO to HAlaal
Reject All Halaal Products!
Halaal is a trojan horse of sharia law!

Then on 14th February, Sri Lanka Minister of Research and Technology Patali Champika Ranawaka, requested that all halal food producers remove the halal certificate. He warned that his Party, Sinhala Buddhist Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) would take action unless the producers of halal heed their demand.

Muslims say that from their perspective there’s nothing wrong if Christians or Buddhist will eat halal foods. It’s just a matter of choice if you like it or not;  but if you outlaw the selling of halal products, then that’s another matter. You are depriving the people of their freedom to choose.

Conversely, the halal certification process is now seen as a violation of the Rights of the Majority who want traditional foods and food services. The Sinhalese majority do not want different products in the market for different groups, because they say this will cause social segregation on religious lines.

It seems clear that halal certification isolates the Muslims followers of Islam from Sri Lankan society, creates tension and challenges the traditional Sri Lankan food culture.

COLOMBO:  A new hardline Sinhalese Buddhist group in Sri Lanka has called for the complete abolition of the Muslim halal system of certifying foods and other goods.

Message...  "The Earth Is For Everyone, Not Only For Muslims"
Message… “The Earth Is For Everyone, Not Only For Muslims”

The Bodu Bala Sena, or Buddhist Strength Force, also said foreign propagators of religions should leave the country within a month.


Yesterday thousands of Sinhalese supporters of the Buddhist majority attended a rally in a suburb of the capital, Colombo…

 The United National Party (UNP) urged The President to make his personal opinion known to the public on the matter of the Halal Certificates and to take action to remove them.

Youth activists at the rally wore T-shirts denouncing the Muslim halal method of slaughtering animals to eat.

Addressing the media in Colombo, UNP Western Provincial Council member Niroshan Padukka said, “As UNP, we do not agree with the concept of Halal Certificates, and support our leader Ranil Wickremesinghe’ s statement that the government should deal with the authorization of these certificates, rather than the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama Halal Certification Authority.
Addressing the media in Colombo, UNP Western Provincial Council member Niroshan Padukka said, “As UNP, we do not agree with the concept of Halal Certificates, and support our leader Ranil Wickremesinghe’ s statement that the government should deal with the authorization of these certificates, rather than the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama Halal Certification Authority.

They reject halal products & services and the creeping Islamification of their country eg. a Mosque has been built in Dambulla, which is considered by many to be a sacred Buddhist area. The prime minister ordered the mosque’s relocation on Sunday, following an attack on the mosque on Friday by hardline Buddhists, including monks and all this amid a rising  religious tension in the country. The Buddhist Sinhalese make up three-quarters of Sri Lanka’s 20 million population.

Sri Lanka Demo in Columbio

Muslims make up less than 10% of the population , but the majority are seeing a rise in halal certified products. This unwanted over-production of halal products & services is considered by the  majority to be threatening their culture and their valued traditions. There is a gradual increase in halal restaurants and Markets and we have even found that Muslims have started to export Halal Fish to the UK from a halal supplier called Ceylon Fisheries Limited via their fully operational processing plant at Tudella, Ja-Ela, Negombo, Sri Lanka.


The increasing halal trade within Sri Lanka is completely unacceptable to the majority, so Sinhalese leaders have now called for a boycott of halal meat and demanded shops clear their stocks by April, according to the AFP news agency reports.

Now the The leading Muslim religious leaders’ group, the All Ceylon Jamiyathul Ulama, has warned against violence threatened by striking Muslims – they have called for Muslims to fast instead. Muslims have now gone on strike in eastern Sri Lanka which have left schools, government offices, buses and the public market all shut after that decree from the main mosque.

ABC Radio Australia have produced this article entitled:
Sri Lankan monks launch halal meat boycott

BBC News ASIA has produced a VIDEO with this article entitled:
Sri Lanka hardline group calls for halal boycott

The Emirates have produced this article entitled:
Buddhist monks demand halal boycott

BOYCOTT HALAL call for International support & recognition that Non-Islamic Nations of the World have a right to protect their unique identities, uphold their values, but most importantly preserve their traditional food chain from a stealth takeover of halal products & services.
Surely we do not have to actually fight to stop the imposition of 7th Century barbaric halal Ritual Slaughter along with all that halal certification entails.
Animals deserve respect and so do the wishes of  all the different unique indigenous populations of the world.



The outcome was that the Government shut down the ACJU Halal Certification Authority.
Then a new Halal Authority was formed under Government control, but also with access to guidance from the Muslim Community Leaders.
ACJU = All Ceylon Jamiyvathul Ulama – was Shut Down.


The new Halal Authority under Government control is the HAC

Old & New Halal logos

HAC = Halal Accreditation Council (Guarantee) Limited.

The HAC Website is more transparent and  includes Company & Brand information and Product Listings.
The HAC Website is more transparent and includes Company & Brand information and Product Listings.

The HAC has now been recognised as a bonafide halal authority by the WHFC
WHFC = World Halal Food Council.

However, it is the Right of those who are Not Followers of Islam to still choose to Reject Halal Certified products in Sri Lanka – which is what they do.

Some of the Brands still being boycotted by Non-muslims in Sri Lanka
Some of the Brands still being boycotted by Non-muslims in Sri Lanka

Halal Certification strengthens Islam, because all the funds from the sale of halal certificates, fund Islamic ends.


We Boycott Halal in Sri Lanka


  • February 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm

    Great Stuff Sri Lanka!! Kick all Muslims out of Sri Lanka! Muslims want to Islamify Sri Lanka!!
    Islam is the root of evil!!

  • February 20, 2013 at 10:19 pm

    I support the protest against the imposition of halal on any non-muslim peoples and object to the label being on other foods. Why should we pay for propogation of a violent religion.

  • February 23, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    Sri Lankan buddhists are no more peaceful than any other community on earth
    They are responsible for starting the cycle of ethnic violence in the Island which led to the civil war.
    And now promoting violence against the muslim community
    I agree that Halal should not be forced down non-muslim throats (excuse the pun) in non-muslim countries though.

    • March 10, 2013 at 10:23 am

      Then you will be as pleased as we are ugk about this Excellent News…
      We are really happy to inform you that “Halal” certification has been stopped in Sri Lanka. Hope this will be a role model for other countries. We won this by showing unity and one solid voice among Sri Lankans (90% of Sri Lankans) who don’t like Halal.

      • April 18, 2013 at 4:06 pm

        Why is Ceylon biscut running an advertisement to say their products does not contain items prohibitted in Islam.

        • April 24, 2013 at 2:56 pm

          Look, if muslims want to be careful about what they eat and keep to a halal diet that is their choice and we have no objection to that.
          What we do object to, is the imposition of halal products and services upon Non-muslims in Non-islamic countries – because those people do not need to follow an Islamic diet or the Islamic way of life… because they are not Followers of Islam – and that fact needs to be respected… it is their choice.
          We want to have Freedom of choice for all – and that desire runs contrary to the aims of Islam which want us all to live under Sharia Law – whether we are muslims of not. 75% of the population of the world are NOT muslims and do not require halal certification, halal products or services – or the haram meat that is cast off from Halal Slaughterhouses and not clearly labelled as Ritually Slaughtered defective meat… so many non-muslims are being tricked into buying it unwittingly… This has got to Stop.
          We will oppose and expose the halal industry which is operating by stealth in many, if not all non-Islamic countries. This halal certification is a huge money making racket that we do not want to be involved in at all, because we are NOT Followers of Islam.

          • May 31, 2015 at 6:48 am

            Why is it taking governments so long to respond to this islamisation of our countries and cultures. The Australian government is ignoring its people even though the long term and catastrophic outcome is evident in so many other countries.
            Good on you India for standing up for your rights to live as traditional Indian people.

  • February 28, 2013 at 12:44 pm

    All Sri Lankans must support NO HALAL and NOTHING BUY FROM MUSLIM SHOPS..

    • March 11, 2013 at 11:28 am

      Boycott muslim garment factory Brandix, Timex Garments, EAM Maliban Textile

      • March 15, 2013 at 6:49 am

        Thank You Ruwan – We will certainly look into these and point them out to our Members!
        Thank You for your support!

  • February 28, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    Should ban the hijab too.
    Such insensitivity towards women is intolerable in a civilized country.

    • March 9, 2013 at 6:35 am

      Yes we agree that no one should feel obliged to wear the hijab in civilized societies like ours.
      We oppose the Violent Oppression of Women in Islam – this should not be happening in the 21st Century in any country of the world – and in fact in an ideal world it never would have happened at all. We must educate people to treat others, whether male or female, with respect… as they would like to be treated themselves.
      You may want to watch this video and share it with others…
      The Violent Oppression of Women in Islam

      • March 10, 2013 at 6:38 am

        If women should wear a sickening dress called Hijab why not introduce a similar dress for Muslim men? Their argument supporting the Hijab is that men seeing a women in a normal dress showing face,hands and legs provokes sexual feelings. The same is true for women when they see a man exposing his legs and hands and face. Why target only women?. Come on, introduce a hijab for Muslim men.

    • March 10, 2013 at 6:32 am

      The next step in this movement should be against the Hijab or the walking black tent. It is an eye sore.

      • March 10, 2013 at 10:16 am

        We must learn from our Sri Lankan Friends who have just informed us as follows…
        We are really happy to inform you that “Halal” certification has been stopped in Sri Lanka. Hope this will be a role model for other countries. We won this by showing unity and one solid voice among Sri Lankans (90% of Sri Lankans) who don’t like Halal.

        However the BBC have not reported on this story at all – so I have been urging our Members to contact them & complain by insisting that the BBC REPORT THE SRI LANKAN VICTORY OVER HALALIFICATION OF THEIR FOOD CHAIN.
        Here: BBC TV NEWS & BBC World News here:

        While writing I also complained that we had to sit through several minutes on ‘fashionable Hijab’ stories yesterday… WHY?
        Let’s support FREEDOM OF CHOICE in Britain and this story could help us ensure Freedom from halal products & services for the 95%+ Non-Muslim population who cannot be assured of getting Non-halal meat in their supermarkets, restaurants or institutions any more!
        Well Done in Sri Lanka… we need to learn your strategy & put it into practice in other countries too!

  • March 1, 2013 at 8:08 am

    Hon. My Great Minister,

    I have been found you are always great, great and the greatest. We assure 0ur fullest support to you. This is a great action. Do not permit any Mosque to come up hereafter and take action to demolish all illegal mosques and encroachments to our religious and cultural sites. Those are our heritage. Wish you all success “HELA URUMAYA”

  • March 1, 2013 at 6:30 pm

    Im sinhalese, im sri lankan, above all im a human being just like all of you and all of the muslims. whatever the damn thing goes on, emotionally charged hooligans and riots are NOT the solution. nor is anti-islam slogans and web-posts. islam is a religon and one demands respect. it, like any other religion, condemns violence. Jihaad, the holy war, is a war of spreading the religion, NOT associated with violence. if few people are trying to fulfil their personal propagandas in the name of islam, then that should be condemned and apt action must be taken, but with calm, clear mind and open judgement. useless these words isnt it???..we we can use our minds..will such a dangerous dictator and his bunch of henchmen get more votes? the other end is an incomprehensible man who’s motives and aims are unclear is another matter..but still??..we people just need some attractive nationalism-filled bunch of one-liners to melt our hearts and lend our vote with open hands…if only we can use our minds a bit more, we’ll understand this halal anti-halal sh!# is another pathetic and dangerous attempt at dividing and breaking down our mother nation, who just finished facing one hell of a terrible war.

    • March 9, 2013 at 6:28 am

      Boycotting Halal in Non-Islamic countries is our Choice and criticising Islamic dogmatism is about Freedom of Speech.
      If the halal industry chooses to impose halal products & services throughout the markets of non-Islamic countries by stealth (most are unlabelled), they will meet opposition.
      If the World Halal Forum declares that they aim to halal certify our well known Brands and impose halal products & services mainstream in UK, Europe, then the World… as they did at Earls Court, London in November 2010 – then Muslims should not be surprised if people like me set up a Pressure Group to oppose their plans… as I did in UK in November 2010 when I began BOYCOTT HALAL. Here is the PROOF…

      It began in 2009 with a secret meeting at Earls Court, London.
      Aim: The UK was chosen to be a Pilot Project without consent or knowledge of the British Government.
      It happened in a meeting behind closed doors without Britain present on 18 November 2009. Making the list of attendance were members’ representatives from Australia, Belgium, Bosnia, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Pakistan, Serbia, Spain, Switzerland and Thailand.

      At this meeting the UK was chosen to be a HALAL PILOT PROJECT by the World Halal Forum [WHF]
      See pages 15 and 25 in this .pdf for what was unilaterally decided for the UK in 2009 by WHF (World Halal Forum).
      QUOTE: ‘3. The forum resolved to work towards a European Halal Regulations and Accreditation system, starting with a single country as a pilot project, with the country proposed being the United Kingdom.” (p.25)

      This is how UK became a Pilot project for the halal products industry – without the consent or knowledge of the British Public !

      Then in 2010 there was a second Meeting in London which was called the 2010 WORLD HALAL FORUM EUROPE
      Date: 10 & 11 November 2010
      Place: Earls Court, London, UK
      After WHF (World Halal Forum) unilaterally decided in 2009 that UK would be a Pilot project for the halal industry (without the consent or knowledge of the British Public), they all met again the next year at Earls Court in 2010 and declared that Halal Products & Services would be “GOING MAINSTREAM”… first in the UK… and then in Europe.
      WHF2010 Branding Video.VOB – See VIDEO

      NOTE: I will NOT be silent and I will encourage people WORLDWIDE who are NOT Muslims in Non-Islamic Countries to BOYCOTT HALAL.

    • June 25, 2014 at 4:22 pm

      I applaud sri lanka for standing up for there religious freedom britain is a multi racial country but we are still the majority I don’t want halal meat sold to me without my knowledge I do respect your rights to have it just like kosher for the jews but keep it for your selves or you might find that like sri lanka you will lose it all together as it is crual and wicked

    • September 30, 2014 at 3:08 am

      Also, Nival, we object to paying an Islamic ‘tax’. Most of the money goes overseas, probably to fund terrorism, because all Muslims will obey the Koran. Imams in Australian have been brazen on tv telling us we will become an Islamic state.So therefore we are paying money to people who plan to wipe out us and our culture.I’m afraid you are living in a fantasy world, my friend, ideal perhaps but alas, not fact. We are now fighting for our very freedom..We do not want to be Islamic or live under Sharia law, and that is what halal tax is all about!

  • March 2, 2013 at 3:49 pm


    Go on Bodu Bala Sena!

  • March 15, 2013 at 4:56 am

    So, we made it from the little island of Sri Lanka.
    The Halal certification is removed and NO religion labels will be displayed in Sri Lanka commodities from now on.
    By the way, it was only Muslims who needed such labels, it is Muslims who demands for a extreme dress code of Hijab, it is also the Muslim who threaten the society for Sharia these are the next elements that we should boycott.
    Welldone to Sri Lankans! Hope the rest of the world, esp the developed countries in the west and Austraila will follow this and stop this unnecessary religious extremism.

  • March 16, 2013 at 12:50 am

    As a vegetarian I think its unethial to eat animals! My question is Now does it really matter how the animal is slaughtered? Basically what you guys are saying is ‘oh yeah killing is fine as long as its painless’

    As far as I am aware Sri lanka is one of the few countries i can think of which has a strong muslim population but has no Muslim extremist terrorism cells (alqaida etc )

    It looks like the sri lankan muslims are resisting fighting back (Withdrawing issuing halal certificates inorder to prevent hostile situation) my worry is there will be a time where they will fight back or where extremist terrorist around the world would see sri lankan muslims as possible candidates to brain wash.

    If this occurs Sri lanka will be facing a civil war in a whole new level! and the sad part is this war will be caused by the actions of the sri lankan monks!

    All i am saying is be carful what you wish for! We all could continue living peaceful and continue moving forward like we are doing since the civil for war ended OR WE COULD GO BACK TO THE DAYS WHERE WE WERE PETRIFIED EVEN TO USE THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTS!

    Do you know whose enjoying all of this?!? the supporters of LTTE! We as a country were meant to unite and move forward together! it looks like we are taking steps back again! Sri Lanka will never move forward UNTIL THE SRI LANKANS UNITE!!! get all of the jealosy and greed out of your system! stop blaming others for your problems! I read an article where a monk was complaining that majority of the sri lankan wealth belongs to the muslims! THIS IS EXAACTLY WHAT HITLER WAS SCREAMING OUT BUT HE WAS BLAMING THE JEWS!

  • Pingback:SRI LANKA CALL FOR HALAL BOYCOTT! | nohalal

  • April 3, 2013 at 6:28 pm

    NIval, who makes a comment above, claims to be a Sinhalese. However NIval’s extraordinarily pro-Muslim stance creates a doubt about that claim. I too know about Islam. My big question is, how can it be considered a ‘religion’ when it fundamentally discriminates an entire ethnic group, that is, Jews, in its doctrine?
    A religion can oppose or deny individuals who behave unacceptably, but not an entire nation without any reason. Islam teaches hatred over Jews, and therefore it is not a religion. Islam is purely politics; politics of the communal, petty-minded and extremist category, since its beginning centuries ago!

  • April 11, 2013 at 10:14 am

    Dear Brothers

    Muslims believe that they will get a place in paradise if they die for their religion,they believe that in paradise 75 virgins called hooris are waiting for them to bang ,Please google the term jannath to see it, now what kind of idiots will believe in heaven and hell,The afghanis and pakistanis are dying as suicide bombers ,because they belive that god will reward them jannath and they can bang 75 virgins each…Boycott these idots.

    Boycott muslim shops

  • March 23, 2014 at 3:46 pm

    Simply wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity for your
    post is just great and that i could think you’re knowledgeable on this subject.
    Fine with your permission allow me to clutch your RSS feed
    to stay updated with approaching post. Thank you one million and please continue the rewarding work.

  • February 1, 2015 at 6:01 am

    Love your website please keep up the good work

    Otherwise we will pay the price

  • January 3, 2018 at 7:07 am

    I refer to the statement “However a four year Dialrel Study carried out by Veterinary Scientists from many countries of Europe found the opposite is true and they concluded that halal ritual slaughter causes unnecessary suffering.” I read the report from the study and what you mentioned above is not reflective of the report. Please quote the exact statement(s) in the Dialrel Study report which confirms what you have written. Otherwise you are not communicating the truth and the rest of the facts in your article can be considered invalid as well, since due diligence is not carried out.

    • January 18, 2018 at 9:46 pm

      Dosmoons – See & hear the Evidence & the Truth for yourself in this Video…
      A Four Year Study of Ritual Slaughter was carried out by Leading European Scientists for the EU and they produced the Dialrel Study Scientific Report, together with this video of evidence which you can watch here… WARNING – VICIOUS CRUELTY SHOWN – BOYCOTT HALAL!
      Halal animal cruelty exposed – Full Documentary
      This Video is narrated by Leading European Scientists who Condemn HALAL RITUAL SLAUGHTER WITHOUT STUNNING and they come to the conclusion that halal Ritual Slaughter is unnecessarily cruel.
      This outrage is going on in many countries of the world.
      Here is the Full Scientific Report that was appointed by the EU into Ritual Slaughter… The DIALREL PROJECT.
      Halal Authorities say there is no evidence that cutting an animals throat while fully conscious, then hanging it to bleed slowly to death is cruel – but clearly there is:
      Veterinary Concerns

    • January 20, 2018 at 6:50 am

      Dosmoons – Having watched & heard the Dialrel Video evidence from leading EU veterinarians from many countries, you may want to look at the conclusion of the report which clearly says on Page 60:

      Without making a value judgement it can be stated that neck cutting without stunning poses the highest risk for animal welfare because restraining for the cut and during bleeding imposes extra manipulation to the animal. Additionally, pain, suffering and distress during the cut and during bleeding are highly likely. The latter is partly reduced during stunning post neck cutting, which represents an intermediate risk for animal welfare. Although stunning methods themselves involve risks to animal welfare which have to be managed, stunning prior to neck cutting represents the lowest risk for overall compromise of animal welfare.

      See also the Chart on the same page entitled:
      Table 7: Comparative ranking of risks with regard to compromised animal welfare due to different slaughter methods
      See risk assessment re. ‘Neck Cutting without stunning’…
      Hazard: Pre slaughter handling stress – High
      Hazard: Pain and suffering during the cut – High
      Hazard: Failure to diagnose of prolonged consciousness or inadequate stunning – High
      Hazard: Need for back up stunning in case of prolonged consciousness/ or failed stunning – High

      Furthermore, see first sentence on page 60:
      Moreover, even considering the variability of routine slaughter conditions, usually no “back up”- stunning is performed after slaughter without stunning.

      Furthermore, see this Quote under ‘Overall Conclusions on Page 59…
      • …there is an increased risk for prolonged consciousness during slaughter without stunning.
      • During neck cutting without stunning and often during post neck cut stunning, restraint is complex and imposes more stress and strain on the animal than during stunning prior to neck cutting. More manipulation of the animal is required to achieve the right position for neck cutting, including stretching the neck in red meat species. In addition, improved post cut management is needed after neck cutting without stunning to achieve optimum bleeding and also avoid the risk of mechanical and chemical stimuli on the wound surfaces.
      • It can be stated with high probability that unstunned animals feel pain during and after the throat cut without prior stunning.

      & from Page 33
      During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction movements and wing flapping.
      In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the throat cut without prior stunning.

      Finally from Page 57…
      • One of the main concerns about slaughter without stunning is that animals are further processed and exposed to potentially painful manipulations (e.g. subjected to follow up cuts, released from restraint or shackled) during the period they are still conscious. This can especially happen if slaughter line speed is too high to wait until the animal is irreversibly unconscious. Painful chemical impacts on the wound and severed organs such as the trachea by blood or stomach contents are also possible during this period.

      SOURCE: This 81 page Scientific Report conducted by The Dialrel Project which was funded by the EU over a period of 4 years.
      Veterinary Concerns

Comments are closed.